Virginia Tech® home

Institutional Review Board

Federal regulations require that all research involving human participants undergo review by a board of scientific and faculty peers, called an Institutional Review Board (IRB), which is supported by the Human Research Protections program.  

At the highest level, the IRB is designed to protect research participants and is required to review proposed research before it is implemented to ensure that it is scientifically valid, risks to participants are minimized to the extent possible, and that risks are reasonable relative to the expected benefits of the research.   

Given the potential risks and benefits, the board ensures that potential participants are informed of the possible risks, aware of key study information, and freely consent to participate. In addition, the board assesses whether the selection of subjects is appropriate to ensure that the burdens and benefits of research are equitably distributed.     

Federal law requires that institutional review boards include scientists from diverse disciplines, a member from a non-science discipline, such as a lawyer, historian, philosopher, or member of the clergy, and a member who is unaffiliated with the university.

A Human Research Protections program (HRPP) protocol coordinator who is assigned at initial submission will manage each research protocol throughout its lifecycle, including facilitating review of the protocol by the full board when required.

Once investigators submit a research protocol, the assigned protocol coordinator completes a pre-review of the submission. They then work closely with the research team to develop a complete submission for board review, as necessary. Protocol coordinators also work closely with member(s) of the Institutional Review Board who serve as the primary and secondary reviewers of the research protocol at the monthly meeting.

The section below includes important dates for the full board review process. The initial submission date allows HRPP protocol coordinators time to complete the pre-review step and work with investigators, as needed. To be considered for the full board meeting date, the submission must be completed by the date listed in the left column below. This means that all pre-review issues must be addressed.

Note: any delay in the pre-review process might cause a submission to be moved to a later IRB meeting date.

Researchers should work with their assigned protocol coordinator to avoid any delay in finalizing submissions.

2023 Dates

Note: Initial submission is due to the Human Research Protection program office on the due date by 5:00 p.m.

Initial Submission Date (Monday)
Full Board Meeting Date (Monday)
Dec. 12, 2022 Jan. 9, 2023
Jan. 23, 2023 Febr. 13, 2023
Febr. 20, 2023 Mar. 13, 2023
Mar. 20, 2023 Apr. 10, 2023
Apr. 17, 2023 May 8, 2023
May 22, 2023 June 12, 2023
June 19, 2023 July 10, 2023
July 24, 2023 Aug. 14, 2023
Aug. 21, 2023 Sept. 11, 2023
Sept. 18, 2023 Oct. 9, 2023
Oct. 23, 2023 Nov. 13, 2023
Nov. 13, 2023 Dec. 11, 2023

2024 Dates

Note: Initial submission is due to the Human Research Protection program office on the due date by 5:00 p.m.

Initial Submission Date (Monday)
Full Board Meeting Date (Monday)
Dec. 11, 2023 Jan. 8, 2024
Jan. 22, 2024 Feb. 12, 2024
Febr. 19, 2024 Mar. 11, 2024
Mar. 18, 2024 Apr. 8, 2024
Apr. 22, 2024 May 13, 2024
May 20, 2024 June 10, 2024
June 17, 2024 July 8, 2024
July 22, 2024 Aug. 12, 2024
Aug. 19, 2024 Sept. 9, 2024
Sept. 23, 2024 Oct. 14, 2024
Oct. 21, 2024 Nov. 11, 2024
Nov. 18, 2024 Dec. 9, 2024
Dec. 16, 2024 Jan. 13, 2025