|
Excerpts from:
Carbon Sequestration
State of the Science
A working paper for roadmapping future carbon sequestration
R&D
February 1999
(The total report can be found at http://www.fetc.doe.gov/publications/press/1999/seqrpt.pdf.)
THE ROAD MAP VISION AND GOALS
The vision for the road map is to:
Possess the scientific understanding of carbon sequestration and
develop to the point of deployment those options that ensure environmentally
acceptable sequestration to reduce anthropogenic CO2
emissions and/or atmospheric concentrations. The goal is to have
the potential to sequester a significant fraction of 1 GtC/year
in 2025 and 4 GtC/year in 2050.
STRATEGIC ISSUES
Following are the general recommendations of the report addressing
strategic issues regarding a comprehensive carbon sequestration
program.
• Sequestration R&D could expand the world’s future options
for dealing with greenhouse gases.
• Many carbon sequestration options are particularly amenable to
improving existing activities—such as CO2 injection during
secondary oil recovery—and often provide important secondary benefits,
such as improving ecosystems during reforestation.
• Some carbon sequestration options, such as improved agricultural
practices, are available practically immediately. Examining ongoing,
field-scale sequestration investigations in terrestrial, geological,
and ocean systems can provide critical experience for designing
the necessary environmental research programs.
• Some carbon sequestration options that have limited capacity
or relatively short carbon residence times could nonetheless make
important near-term contributions during a transition to other longer-term
carbon management options. Other carbon sequestration options can
provide significant long-term contributions.
• For carbon sequestration to be a viable option, it needs to be
safe, predictable, reliable, measurable, and verifiable; and it
needs to be competitive with other carbon management options, such
as energy-efficient systems and decarbonized energy technologies.
• Carbon sequestration is an immature field, so multiple fundamental
R&D approaches are warranted and significant breakthroughs can
be expected. The federal government is an appropriate sponsor of
carbon sequestration R&D.
• Integrated analyses of the carbon sequestration system should
be periodically updated to evaluate the potential contributions,
costs, and benefits of various carbon sequestration options.
• The information from the R&D program should be provided to
policy makers to aid them in developing policy and selecting the
most efficient and effective solutions to the issues of climate
change.
Separation and Capture of CO2 from the Energy System
In our assessment of the scientific and technological gaps between
the requirements for CO2 separation and capture and the
capabilities to meet these requirements, many explicit and specific
R&D needs were identified.
• A science-based and applications-oriented R&D program is
needed to establish the efficacy of current and novel CO2
separation processes as important contributors to carbon emissions
mitigation. Important elements of such a program include the evaluation,
improvement, and development of chemical and physical absorption
solvents, chemical and physical adsorbents, membrane separation
devices with selectivity and specificity for CO2 -containing
streams, molecular and kinetic modeling of the materials and processes,
and laboratory-scale testing of the selected processes.
• Field tests are needed of promising new CO2 separation
and capture options in small bypass streams at large point sources
of CO2 , such as natural gas wells and hydrogen production
plants.
The most likely options currently identifiable for CO2
separation and capture include
• chemical and physical absorption
• physical and chemical adsorption
• low-temperature distillation
• gas-separation membranes
• mineralization and biomineralization
• vegetation
Sequestration in the Oceans
These approaches will require better understanding of marine ecosystems
to enhance the effectiveness of applications and avoid undesirable
consequences.
• Field experiments of CO2 injection into the ocean
are needed to study the physical/chemical behavior of the released
CO2 and its potential for ecological impact.
• Ocean general circulation models need to be improved and used
to determine the best locations and depths for CO2 injection
and to determine the long-term fate of CO2 injected into
the ocean.
• The effect of fertilization of surface waters on the increase
of carbon sequestered in the deep ocean needs to be determined,
and the potential ecological consequences on the structure and function
of marine ecosystems and on natural biogeochemical cycling in the
ocean need to be studied.
• New innovative concepts for sequestering CO2 in the
ocean need to be identified and developed.
Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystems
• The terrestrial ecosystem is a major biological scrubber for
atmospheric CO2 (present net carbon sequestration is
~2 GtC/year) that can be significantly increased by careful manipulation
over the next 25 years to provide a critical "bridging technology"
while other carbon management options are developed.
Carbon sequestration could conceivably be increased by several
gigatonnes per year beyond the natural rate of 2 GtC per year, but
that may imply intensive management and/or manipulation of a significant
fraction of the globe’s biomass. However, those potentials do not
yet include a total accounting of economic and energy costs to achieve
these levels. Ecosystem protection is important and may reduce or
prevent loss of carbon currently stored in the terrestrial biosphere.
The focus for research, however, should be on increasing the rate
of long-term storage in soils in managed systems.
• Research on three key interrelated R&D topics is needed to
meet goals for carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems:
— Increase understanding of ecosystem structure and function
directed toward nutrient cycling, plant and microbial biotechnology,
molecular genetics, and functional genomics.
— Improve measurement of gross carbon fluxes and dynamic carbon
inventories through improvements to existing methods and through
development of new instrumentation for in situ, nondestructive
below-ground observation and remote sensing for aboveground
biomass measurement, verification, and monitoring of carbon
stocks.
— Implement scientific principles into tools such as irrigation
methods, efficient nutrient delivery systems, increased energy
efficiency in agriculture and forestry, and increased byproduct
use.
• Field-scale experiments in large-scale ecosystems will be necessary
to understanding both physiological and geochemical processes regulating
carbon sequestration based upon integrative ecosystem models. Such
carbon sequestration experiments are needed to provide proof-of-principle
testing of new sequestration concepts and integration of sequestration
science and engineering principles.
Sequestration in Geologic Formations
• Fundamental and applied research is needed to improve the ability
to understand, predict, and monitor the performance of sequestration
in oil, gas, aqueous, and coal formations. Elements of such a program
include multiphase flow in heterogeneous and deformable media; phase
behavior; CO2 dissolution and reaction kinetics, micromechanics
and deformation modeling; coupled hydrologic-chemical-mechanical-thermal
modeling; and high-resolution geophysical imaging. Advanced concepts
should be included, such as enhancement of mineral trapping with
catalysts or other chemical additives, sequestration in composite
geologic formations, microbial conversion of CO2 to methane,
rejuvenation of depleted oil reservoirs, and CO2 -enhanced
methane hydrate production.
• A nationwide assessment is needed to determine the location and
capacity of the geologic formations available for sequestration
of CO2 from each of the major power-generating regions
of the United States. Screening criteria for choosing suitable options
and assessing capacity must be developed in partnership with industry,
the scientific community, and public and regulatory oversight agencies.
• Pilot-scale field tests of CO2 sequestration should
be initiated to develop cost and performance data and to help prioritize
future R&D needs. The tests must be designed and conducted with
sufficient monitoring, modeling, and performance assessment to enable
quantitative evaluation of the processes responsible for geologic
sequestration. Pilot testing will lay the groundwork for collaboration
with industrial partners on full-scale demonstration projects.
Advanced Biological Processes
• Research should be initiated on the genetic and protein engineering
of plants, animals, and microorganisms to address improved metabolic
functions that can enhance, improve, or optimize carbon management
via carbon capture technology, sequestration in reduced carbon compounds,
use in alternative durable materials, and improved productivity.
• The objectives and goals of the advanced biological research
should be linked to those specific problems and issues outlined
for carbon sequestration in geological formations, oceans, and soils
and vegetation so that an integrated research approach can elucidate
carbon sequestration at the molecular, organism, and ecosystem levels.
• Short-, mid-, and long-term goals in advanced biological research
should be instituted so that scale-up issues, genetic stability
in natural settings, and efficacy in the field can be assessed.
Advanced Chemical Approaches
• The proper focus of R&D into advanced chemical sciences and
technologies is on transforming gaseous CO2 or its constituent
carbon into materials that either are benign, inert, long-lived
and contained in the earth or water of our planet, or have commercial
value.
— Benign by-products for sequestration should be developed.
This avenue may offer the potential to sequester large (gigatonne)
amounts of anthropogenic carbon.
— Commercial products need to be developed. This approach probably
represents a lesser potential (millions of tonnes) but may result
in collateral benefits.
• The chemical sciences can fill crucial gaps identified in the
other focus areas. In particular, environmental chemistry is an
essential link in determining the impact and consequences of these
various approaches. Studies to address the specific gaps identified
in Chap. 7 should be conducted to ensure that other focus areas
meet their potential.
Why is Carbon Sequestration Important?
It is important to carry out research on carbon sequestration for
several reasons:
• Carbon sequestration could be a major tool for reducing carbon
emissions from fossil fuels. However, much work remains to be done
to understand the science and engineering aspects and potential
of carbon sequestration options.
• Given the magnitude of carbon emission reductions needed to stabilize
the atmospheric CO2 concentration, multiple approaches
to carbon management will be needed. Carbon sequestration should
be researched in parallel with increased energy efficiency and decarbonization
of fuel. (These efforts should be closely coordinated to exploit
potential synergies.)
• Carbon sequestration is compatible with the continued large-scale
use of fossil fuels, as well as greatly reduced emissions of CO2
to the atmosphere. Current estimates of fossil fuel resources—including
conventional oil and gas, coal, and unconventional fossil fuels
such as heavy oil and tar sands—imply sufficient resources to supply
a very large fraction of the world’s energy sources through the
next century.
• The natural carbon cycle is balanced over the long term but dynamic
over the short term; historically, acceleration of natural processes
that emit CO2 is eventually balanced by an acceleration
of processes that sequester carbon, and vice versa. The current
increase in atmospheric carbon is the result of anthropogenic mining
and burning of fossil carbon, resulting in carbon emissions into
the atmosphere that are unopposed by anthropogenic sequestration.
Developing new sequestration techniques and accelerating existing
techniques would help diminish the net positive atmospheric carbon
flux.
Although the current DOE carbon sequestration program is modest
in scale, many of the foundations have already been built for significantly
expanding this effort. The DOE Office of Science program on CO2
sequestration includes both the Office of Basic Energy Sciences
(BES) and the Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER).
The primary relevant goal for BES is to develop major new fundamental
knowledge that crosscuts DOE’s applied programs related to carbon
management, including such disciplines as materials sciences, chemical
sciences, geosciences, plant and microbial biosciences, and engineering
sciences. BES has long standing programs in fundamental research,
such as improved materials synthesis and combustion engineering
for more efficient energy technologies, improved catalysts for low-carbon
industrial processes, improved understanding of biological mechanisms
of carbon fixation, and improved understanding of fluid flow in
the subsurface for geological sequestration (www.er.doe.gov/production/bes/bes.html).
In 1999, a new program in BES and BER will be initiated to conduct
research in carbon management, including carbon sequestration, as
a result of the climate change technology initiative. The subjects
will include sequencing genomes of methane- and hydrogen-producing
microorganisms; enhancing the natural terrestrial and oceanic fluxes
of CO2; and improving the understanding of biological
carbon fixation, materials, catalysts, combustion chemistry, and
physics and chemistry of geological reservoirs. BER has a longstanding
fundamental research program on the global carbon cycle. Current
research focuses on atmospheric measurements of carbon fluxes and
related processes, terrestrial carbon fluxes, and advanced biological
investigations of carbon in terrestrial and ocean margin systems.
A key element of terrestrial carbon research involves Ameriflux,
which is a network of CO2 flux measurements across North,
Central, and South America to quantify net CO2 exchange
between the atmosphere and representative terrestrial ecosystems.
Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments provide information
about changes in the carbon content of ecosystems under increased
concentrations of atmospheric CO2, altered temperatures,
and altered precipitation regimes. Relevant information can be found
at www.er.doe.gov/production/ober/gc/accc-fr.html
and http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/programs/ameriflux.
Ocean research focuses on molecular biological approaches to understanding
the coupling between carbon and nitrogen cycles (www.er.doe.gov/production/ober/GC/accc-ft.html).
BER also sponsors a program, Integrated Assessment of Global Climate
Change that supports research in understanding carbon management
frameworks for integrated assessment modeling activities. DOE’s
Office of Fossil Energy has a program on CO2 capture
and sequestration to develop and demonstrate technically, economically,
and ecologically sound methods to capture, reuse, and dispose of
CO2. In 1998, DOE made awards for 12 "cutting-edge" research
projects, ranging from the use of CO2 –absorbing algae
growing on artificial reefs to deep-ocean or deep-saline-reservoir
greenhouse gas disposal. Some of these projects may be selected
for further development. (Details on this solicitation can be found
at www.fe.doe.gov). The Office
of Fossil Energy has recently undertaken an initiative to provide
formal management direction to sequestration program activities
and to establish program content and funding priorities. A team
has been assembled to define a research strategy clearly and to
ensure coordination with internal and external stakeholders. In
making its recommendations, the team will draw heavily from this
report. In FY 1999, the second phase of the Fossil Energy novel
concept investigations will obtain the required engineering and
economic data to proceed to proof-of-concept. In the areas of geological
and ocean sequestration, international government/industry projects
will continue. In 1991 the International Energy Agency (IEA) established
a Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme focused on analyzing technologies
for capturing, using, and storing CO2. It has expanded
to include methane, as well as forestation options. The program
is currently in its third 3-year phase and has support from 16 countries
(including the United States) and a growing number of industrial
organizations. (Details on this program can be found at www.ieagreen.org.uk.)
In addition to government studies, industry is moving ahead with
development of CO2 sequestration technologies:
• The World Resources Institute has formed a consortium with
General Motors, Monsanto, and British Petroleum to address the
fundamental issues of global energy supply, climate change,
and economic growth—paths to stabilizing CO2 concentrations
at levels reducing risks of climate change (WRI 1998).
• Since October 1996, STATOIL, a Norwegian energy company,
has been separating CO2 from natural gas and injecting
it, at a rate of 1 million tonnes per year, into a deep saline
reservoir 800–1000 meters below the ocean floor in the North
Sea (see Chap. 5).
• About 70 oil fields use CO2 injection to recover
additional crude oil.
• Various oil companies have proposed to sequester CO2
at the rate of 30 million tonnes of carbon per year in the deep
aquifers adjacent to the Natuna gas field, in the South China
Sea, when that field comes into production.
• Many domestic and international forest preservation and management
projects sequester carbon by reducing deforestation and harvest
impacts. Forest management can also enhance existing carbon
sinks. These industrial efforts are very important, but the
amounts of CO2 sequestered are very small compared
with overall emissions. Considerable R&D investment by government
and industry is needed to enable sequestration of sufficient
quantities of CO2 to mitigate any adverse effects
resulting from CO2 emissions.
|